TTM 57SL General Discussion

Talk about the latest mixer from Rane

building overviews

how effective is this feature especially BPM wise?
At 12:32 AM 28 November 2008
Bobby Budnik wrote
They might as well make it mandatory.

BPM's
Waveforms
Accurate Loops
Accurate FX
Broken files

the list is long on why you should build your overviews.
At 6:59 AM 28 November 2008
DJ Prinvale` wrote
Building overviews isn't really an option.
As Prinvale' said, we should make this mandatory.

The auto bpm is very accurate. The best one I've ever used.
Just make sure to set the range according to what type of files your wanting to add bpm info to.
At 6:22 PM 2 December 2008
Zach S wrote

Rane, Support
Add autogain to Prinvale`'s list.
At 8:59 AM 8 December 2008
nobspangle wrote
As far as the BPM detection, I would agree with Zach's comment that it's the best thing out there for that. In my experience it's about 99.5 percent accurate, giving good results even on older music with a lot of tempo variations (seems to do a good job of finding an average).

The one ongoing problem I run into is certain types of "shuffle"/"triplet" rhythms sometimes return a result that is about 1/3 less than the real tempo. Depeche Mode "Personal Jesus", for example, gets calculated at 98 instead of the 130BPM that the song actually is.

My workaround for those songs is to select the (incorrect) value in SSL (all digits), copy, then paste into the calculator, multiply by 1.33333333, then paste the result back into the BPM field for the song.
At 9:57 AM 8 December 2008
DJMark wrote
for less button presses on your calculator multiply by 4 and divide by 3 ;)
At 6:57 PM 8 December 2008
nobspangle wrote

To post on the forum you need to log in. Click here to log in, or if you do not yet have an account then click here to create an account.